Welcome to Synthiam!

The easiest way to program the most powerful robots. Use technologies by leading industry experts. ARC is a free-to-use robot programming software that makes servo automation, computer vision, autonomous navigation, and artificial intelligence easy.

Get Started
United Kingdom
Asked — Edited

Auto Position And Ssc-32 Servo Release

I have touch on a similar subject in a previous post about using "Servo Release" using the virtual commands, to which a way of doing this has not been found.

So I thought I would try the Auto Position control today, and used the virtual ports and set up some servos connected to an SSC-32U. On the digital ports in the Auto Position control, 0 releases the servos from their holding position fine. But I found that using 0 or -1 using virtual ports still hold the servos position.

So two question.

1.) Could a "0" servo release command be added to the Auto Position control to act the same way as the digital ports?

2.) I received an email from RobotShop which said the following...


Sending position 0 to your SSC-32U for any channel will cancel movement for that channel and also stop sending a signal (i.e.: releasing that servo motor).

For example, to stop/release a servo motor on channel #5, you would send: #5P0 <cr>.

What would be the EZ-Script command to perform the above mentioned #5P0 <cr> command using UARTWrite? (There should be no space between #5P0 and <cr> . This was done because of forum formatting).


Upgrade to ARC Pro

ARC Early Access will give you immediate updates and new features needed to unleash your robot's potential!

United Kingdom
In regards to question 2 in the post above, here's what I use to move servos with scripts which I got from RR's tutorial...


$pos = "P1450" 
$m_speed = "S700"

I don't see how I should convert the #5P0 <cr> servo release command mentioned above in the above post to an EZ Script command like the one above.
i'll take a look at the ssc-32 control for releasing a servo

but for our ez-script, just change the code to S0 instead of S700
United Kingdom
Okay, thanks DJ. I'll try changing the 700 to 0 as well.
United Kingdom

Easy when you now how ;).

Putting the zero in place of the sevo positions worked great, and does indeed release the servo. I had a feeling that's what needed to be done and thought I did that a few weeks back, but realise I thing I changed the speed by accident instead (I have a tendency of doing that recently), but after Richards warning about dropping a servos position to anything under 500 of over 2500 could potentially burn out a servo out, I was a little cautious as I only have one spare servo left, so wanted to be sure.

Anyway, many thanks. At least E4-B4 (and any future robots) will be a lot quieter now (buzz buzz).:)

Thanks again.